PMPA Craftsman Cribsheet #134:
ISO Material Groups: Steel

Published December 1, 2024

By David Wynn, Technical Services Manager, PMPA

Download/View Cribsheet

 

The letter “P” is for all steels in the ISO material group categories. Within that category there are subgroups. Most manufacturers break it into a range of four to seven categories. I find they are often broken down into five categories. Some manufacturers break it down as a range of machinability with P05 being the most free cutting to P40 being the most difficult. A few manufacturers who use seven groups include martensitic stainless steel as categories P5 and P6. I don’t like this in practice because I think stainless steel tends to be its own animal. Some manufacturers use a two number coding system rather than the single number seen below. The chart that will help you interpret where to find your material. The material listings are not exhaustive, but examples of materials found in that subgroup to provide understanding of what materials fit into that group. Find a grade-specific reference in a reference manual to get SFM with HSS. That will provide a reference point for what SFM you should use with the carbide. The SFM guidelines given based on material groups above can vary greatly, which can be seen in the machinability range. Machinability is calculated as a percentage of 1,212 (1,212 = 100%). 

 

 

 

 

Author

David Wynn

David Wynn, MBA, is the PMPA Technical Services Manager with over 20 years of experience in the areas of manufacturing, quality, ownership, IT and economics. Email: gro.apmp@nnywd — Website: pmpa.org.

The Power of the Coating

Diamonds are pure carbon, and they will weld to the carbon in the steel.

by David Wynn

Director of Technical Services, PMPA

Published December 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

 

 

 

Tool coatings are everywhere. Coatings can be found for all sorts of applications. With all the choices out there, it becomes confusing which ones to choose. How do we know the right coating for our application? When we understand tool coatings, we unlock the potential of our machine tools.

Cold Welding
One of the first considerations when evaluating a tool coating for an application involves avoiding cold welding. Cold welding is the process where like materials under extreme pressure are bonded together. The atoms bond and it becomes a homogeneous mass. But why does cold welding matter for tool coatings? The reason is cutting forces in our machines are extreme. When using a tool coating that is similar or the same as the material we are cutting, the tool will weld to the material. This is why there are recommendations for avoiding certain coatings with certain materials.

Cold welding is the reason diamond-coated inserts are not good for steel.

Diamonds are pure carbon, and they will weld to bond with the carbon in the steel.

What do we need our coating to do? Is it to remove heat? To reduce friction? Do we need it to have edge strengthening properties for interrupted cuts? Does it need to help protect the tool from highly abrasive materials that contain aluminum oxides? There are coatings that offer high performance in multiple categories. All-purpose coatings work well in most general applications; however something like AlTiN is not recommended for use in aluminum alloys because of cold welding.

Heat Is the Enemy
The enemy of our tool coating is heat. Specific types of coatings can take distinct levels of heat before they start to degrade. It is important to know the factors that generate heat in the cutting tool. In physics, friction is where the heat is generated. In machining, we say speed causes heat, not feed. I know people are going to say they both cause heat. Both can, but speed puts heat into the tool whereas feed puts heat into the chip. We all know you can feed so hard you break a tool, but the fracture occurred due to forces flexing the tool, not overheating causing coating and edge failure.

Notes to coatings:

Max Working Temp. The temperature the coating will start to break down. You need to maintain cutting temperatures below this value to preserve the coating. Coolant and speed will play a significant role.

Vickers Hardness. The higher this value the more edge protection your tool will have. A higher value provides protection against abrasive inclusions in material. All data in this article is in Vickers Scale HV 0.05.

Coefficient of Friction. Friction is the enemy of our tool coating. Lower values of coefficient of friction allow us to achieve greater speed without coating wear. A lower value will also reduce flank wear because of less pressure when rubbing.

TiN. Titanium Nitride coating has been around a long time. It is that familiar gold color on tooling we have all seen and is still a solid coating for general purpose applications. It has a max working temperature of around 1,000 degrees F. TiN has a Vickers hardness of approximately 2,300 (varies by manufacturer). TiN has a coefficient of friction about 0.40.

AlTiN. Aluminum Titanium Nitride is a great all-around coating. It is a black to gray shiny coating. It has a max working temperature of around 1,400 degrees degrees F. AlTiN has a Vickers hardness of approximately 3,500 (varies by manufacturer). AlTiN has a coefficient of friction about 0.70.

TiB2. Titanium Diboride is great in non-ferrous materials. It is a dull gray-white coating. It has a max working temperature of around 900 degrees F. TiB2 has a Vickers hardness of approximately 2,800 (varies by manufacturer). TiB2 has a coefficient of friction about 0.35.

DLC. Diamond-like carbon (or amorphous diamond) is great in non-ferrous materials. It is a dull black coating. It has a max working temperature of around 750 degrees F. DLC has a Vickers hardness of approximately 8,200 (varies by manufacturer). DLC has a coefficient of friction about 0.1.

Tool coatings are changing all the time. Companies like PH Horn are producing new coatings and reinventing old ones. Experiment with different companies’ coatings within the same families. For instance, one company’s AlTiN may be better than another for your current application. Within the standard families of coatings, there are hundreds of proprietary coatings offered. Stay up to date with your technical sales reps to get coatings that will work best in your application. Having a great relationship with your tech rep will go a long way to getting your job done as efficiently as possible. Here’s to more chips in the hopper and more parts in the pan!

 

Author

David Wynn is the PMPA Director of Technical Services with over 20 years of experience in the areas of manufacturing, quality, ownership, IT and economics. Email David

 

Keeping It In The Family —
Succession Tips From Those Who Lived It, Part 2

PMPA members share some tips to avoid getting burned when passing the business torch from one family member to another.

by Carli Kistler-Miller

Director of Programs & Marketing, PMPA

Published December 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

 

 

In the previous installment of this series, I talked to John Detterbeck, an outgoing leader, and Travis Donaldson, an incoming leader. This month, I talked to their counterparts — incoming leader, Kyle Detterbeck, and outgoing leader, Glenn Donaldson — to get their persepective on succession in a family business.

Work Your Way Up

Kyle Detterbeck is the president of Lester Detterbeck Enterprises in Iron River, Michigan. He went to college for construction management and started building houses after graduation. Once the market fell in 2008, Kyle looked to the family business for a job. His father, John Detterbeck, the president at that time, did not invite Kyle into the office for a job. To hone his problem-solving skills, Kyle worked on the shop floor for over 11 years, learning the business and how to run each machine. It’s also where he realized how much he loves manufacturing. Kyle shared the following advice:

  • Work somewhere else before you commit to the family business. It’s important to experience the employee’s perspective with a boss that isn’t related.
  • Set boundaries. Mixing family and business can be tricky. Kyle and John agreed to not talk about work outside of the shop.
  • The business is like another child for the parent and letting go may not be easy. But it’s imperative that the employees see one decision maker. The transition of leadership should be clear.
  • This decision takes a lot of consideration by all parties.

Family First

In 1989, Glenn Donaldson and his wife Joan started Donmac Precision in Foxboro, Ontario, Canada. Glenn’s first 10+ years in the industry were spent working for a business owned by brothers and their father. As Glenn states, “The dysfunctionality that was brought around from them working together was well illustrated by one of the brothers refusing to accept visits from his family shortly before he succumbed to his illness midlife.” To maintain his family, Glenn was determined that his children would not work at Donmac as a career.

However, his son, Travis, was working elsewhere and expressed interest in working at Donmac. After much deliberation, Glenn and Travis agreed to try, but promised each other that family would always come first. That promise was put to the test as the succession plan came to fruition. They had similar personalities and clashes were inevitable.
Glenn also experienced the struggle of letting go of a business that he had grown and worked at for 35 years. But he realized that if he didn’t let go then no one benefited. Both he and Travis needed a chance to grow into their next stage in life. As Glenn states, “It may be the hardest years of your business owning career … but if you perservere, like you did so far to stay in business through those unavoidable valleys … you will enjoy the personal, financial and family rewards.

Common Threads
Even though the journey was different for John, Kyle, Glenn and Travis, I did find some common threads. Emotions and personalities are a big factor when going through a succession plan. It takes years for a succession plan to come to fruition. And it’s important to remember that family is always more important than business. 

 

 

Author

Carli Kistler-Miller, MBA has over 25 years of experience with operations, event/meeting planning, marketing, writing and communications.
Email: gro.apmp@rellimc — Website: pmpa.org.

Composition of Steel-Reporting Practices for Unspecified Elements

Sometimes the test report shows more chemical elements than we expect. Here’s why.

by Miles Free III

Director of Industry Affairs, PMPA

Published December 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

 

 

 

The Certified Test Reports (CTRs), or chem certifications (chemical certs), report the chemical elements and results of other testing of the steel products that we ordered. But in addition to the elements specifically required for a given steel grade, there are small amounts of other elements present. This article will explain the reporting practices and significance (or lack of significance) of these little-understood chemical ingredients or designations.
A steel grade is determined by its chemical composition. Its chemical composition is what makes the development of expected properties and performance possible. Depending on the different chemical elements present, a steel may be designated as a carbon, alloy or stainless steel grade. There are other types of steels — for example, tool steels and heat-resistant steels — but we are focusing on carbon and alloy bar steels most often encountered in our precision machining, production machining shops.
Carbon and alloy bar steels are produced, certified and sold according to a variety of ASTM Standard Specifications. These standards provide not only the requirements for the steels to meet but also the definitions of many terms that describe them and their performance. The three ASTM Standard Specifications that we consulted for this article include ASTM A 29 (latest edition) Standard Specification for General Requirements for Steel Bars, Carbon and Alloy, Hot Wrought; ASTM A 108 (latest edition) Standard Specification for Steel Bar, Carbon and Alloy, Cold Finished; and ASTM A 751 (latest edition): Standard Test Methods, Practices and Terminology for Chemical Analysis of Steel Products. These are the foundations for defining commercial product compliance and product attributes.

Elements by any Other Name: Specified Elements
Each grade of steel has a list of chemical element ingredients that must be present for the material to be compliant and meet specification; these are called specified elements. Specified elements are present within a specified minimum and maximum range, as listed in the specification. Carbon, manganese, phosphorus and sulfur are specified elements in carbon steels. Lead can be a specified element if the steel is a leaded carbon steel. Note that due to differences in testing and analytical procedures, these minima and maxima can vary based on whether the testing is at time of heat or cast (melt) analysis, semi-finished or in the final product. Due to segregation in different types of steels, variations in some of these elements may not be cause for rejection based on product analysis. In alloy steels, alloying elements including nickel, chromium and molybdenum are common, with lead, vanadium and boron also possibly specified.
There are other chemical elements present that may or may not be reported on the certification documents. In casual conversations, these names are often substituted for one another, but each of these categories of additional chemical make up can have a different origin and, perhaps, impact. ASTM A 751: Standard Test Methods, Practices and Terminology for Chemical Analysis of Steel Products authorizes the producer to report unspecified as well as specified elements on the test report. This standard defines specified elements, intentionally added unspecified elements, residual elements and trace elements. Not listed, but often used as a name for some of these categories are the terms “incidental elements” and “tramp elements.”

Elements by any Other Name: Unspecified Elements
Unspecified elements may be either intentionally added, or unintentionally find their way into the melt as component of the raw materials or process. Intentionally added (in controlled amounts) unspecified elements can include deoxidizers, grain refiners or deliberate, modest additions of other elements to enhance or develop properties. Silicon is an unspecified element (not listed in Table 1 of ASTM A29) as an ingredient but can be added in ranges: 0.10% max; 0.10%-0.20%; 0.15%-0.35%; 0.20%-0.40% or 0.30% to 0.60% (per footnote B). Sometimes the amount of chromium added to a medium carbon, plain carbon steel is increased just to ensure achievement of a minimum hardenability or mechanical property for the customer.
Unspecified elements that are not intentionally added may be called residual elements or trace elements. Residual elements are picked up from either initial raw materials (in the scrap, ores or fluxes) or can be absorbed by the melt from refractories. In electric furnace steels, copper is a prime example. Copper is contained in small quantities in the scrap steel charged into the furnace, showing up as higher quantities in electric furnace melt steels compared to basic oxygen steels, which have a limited scrap charge. However, the electric furnace shop can add quantities of direct reduced iron (DRI) to reduce the level of residuals in the steel by dilution. Occasionally, copper can be specified as a 0.20% minimum.
Trace element is the designation given to residual elements that appear in very low concentrations — less than 0.01% by weight.
According to the Steel Bar Product Manual, Iron and Steel Society, 1994, “Certain elements are present in small quantities in most steels. They are not intentionally added but have been retained from the raw materials used during production of the steel. These elements are considered incidental or residual as long as they do not exceed certain
maximum limits.”

What’s Left?
Sometimes, a test report will show a percentage “all others” or “balance.” Typically in steels that value is referring to iron, which makes up the balance of the material.

Conclusion
Zero is a charming artifact of the 20th century, back when there were only three black-and-white TV channels, and when parts-per-million precision required government laboratory levels of equipment and budget. Parts per billion were not even a thought. As analytical methods have advanced, the zero has receded so far that in some commercially common laboratory methods, we can truly “count atoms.” Many chemical elements that are naturally occurring can be found in residual, incidental or trace levels or quantities, given a suitably equipped laboratory and budget. They can be found as well in foods, soils, drinks and packaging, as well as in the metallic and polymeric raw materials we machine in our shops.
The reporting of chemical composition is important, but understanding the levels of the chemical elements in terms of weight percent and specification threshold is critical if we are to avoid overreaction at seeing some trace or incidental value as cause for alarm.

 

 

 

Author

Miles Free III is the PMPA Director of Industry Affairs with over 50 years of experience in the areas of manufacturing, quality and steelmaking. Miles’ podcast is at pmpa.org/podcast. Email Miles

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reason that PMPA members closely follow the ITR Quarterly Forecast Report is that their process of analysis clarifies and makes patterns clear that the news cycle seems to miss. Everybody seems to know that the economy is terrible, people can’t find work, and sales are down in many sectors. And yet Inflation IS easing, Real Incomes ARE RISING, and Employment is at RECORD HIGHS. In this month’s ITR forecast, we get a guided tour as to which important industry segments are plateauing, which declining, and which are in recession. And why that may be good news- as the data shows that those markets will probably be in recovery in 2025. What is the broader market data forecasting  for the 8 Industries that drive our precision machining shops in 2025? Check out in this month’s PMPA November 2024 Economic Report from ITR Economics.

View/Download

 

The Institute for Trend Research (ITR) quarterly reports focus on major areas of economic growth and decline in key market segments for the Precision Machined Products Industry. They are provided to PMPA members as part of the association’s overall business intelligence program and are used as a management tool to help PMPA members plan for what lies ahead and which markets they should focus on in a complex manufacturing environment. 

STATE OF MANUFACTURING – South Carolina Manufacturing

by Joe Jackson

Marketing & Events Assistant, PMPA

Published November 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

Fabricated Metal Products Manufacturing is a subsector of manufacturing that makes critical goods from metal components.

Precision Turned Products Manufacturing is a subsector of fabricated metal product manufacturing that makes the components that MAKE IT WORK!

 

SOUTH CAROLINA ECONOMIC OUTPUT

South Carolina Manufacturing
NAICS 31-33
$39,260,000,000

Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
NAICS 332
$6,492,499,000

Precision Turned Product Manufacturing
NAICS 332721
$220,253,000

SOUTH CAROLINA MANUFACTURING ACCOUNTS FOR

Manufacturing Is Productivity –15.1% of South Carolina’s total output (GDP)

Manufacturing Builds Businesses –3,425 manufacturing establishments in the state of South Carolina.

Manufacturing Creates Jobs – 11.71% of all South Carolina’s employees are in the manufacturing sector. (253,000 employees)

Manufacturing produces for South Carolina

  • Manufacturing is the 3rd largest GDP Producer in South Carolina.
  • Manufacturing in South Carolina exported over $29 billion in goods in 2020.

South Carolina is a great place for a career in manufacturing

  • Manufacturing jobs pay on average 33% over the average job in South Carolina. (according to NAM.org)
  • Job sites are currently reporting in excess of 2,800 available manufacturing job openings in South Carolina.

 

Sources: NAM.org, US Census, statista.com, IndustrySelect.com
Data selected to show relative values. May not be directly comparable due to differences in sampling, analysis, or date obtained.

 

 

 

 

Author

Joe Jackson

Marketing & Events Assistant, PMPA

Email: gro.apmp@noskcajj — Website: pmpa.org.

PMPA Craftsman Cribsheet #133:
Identifying ISO Workpiece Material Groups

Published November 1, 2024

By David Wynn, Technical Services Manager, PMPA

Download/View Cribsheet

 

When you look at a box of inserts, you see a colored coded set of letters and numbers for our feeds and speeds.

What does all this mean? There was a time when I used a book to look up speeds and feeds for a specific material. If I were machining 12L14, there would be a chart for that. If I were machining 4140, there would be a chart for that. ISO material groups are based on the types of material in large groups. The letter “P” represents all steels. It encompasses free-machining steels, carbon steels and alloys. Sometimes martensitic stainless are included in the “P” group. The benefit of grouping is that the materials in the “P” group generally need similar coatings, chipbreakers and clearance angles. When dialing in final feeds and speeds it gets a little more complicated. In general companies use “01” as the designator for re-sulphurized and leaded steels. Then starting at low carbon with “10” moving on from there. Below is a list of six main categories with their color coding.

All manufacturers may use slightly different shades of color, but the general coloring will be the same. When selecting the right tooling for a job, it is important to understand how that selection impacts your end results. Understanding ISO material groups aligns your thinking with how manufacturers are presenting the information. 

In the next couple of months, I will explore each of the six categories and try to find generalized ways to understand the subcategories. Since there is no standardized system for the subcategories, it will be a guide on how to interpret most manufacturers’ representation of the information. Look at box of inserts or the technical sheet for that box. You will start to recognize this system everywhere. With an understanding of the language, you can better grasp the why.

 

 

 

 

Author

David Wynn

David Wynn, MBA, is the PMPA Technical Services Manager with over 20 years of experience in the areas of manufacturing, quality, ownership, IT and economics. Email: gro.apmp@nnywd — Website: pmpa.org.

Keeping It In The Family —
Succession Tips From Those Who Lived It, Part 1

PMPA members share some tips to avoid getting burned when
passing the business torch from one family member to another.

by Carli Kistler-Miller

Director of Programs & Marketing, PMPA

Published November 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

 

 

Owning a business has its own landmines, but add a family dynamic to it and successions become quite the minefield. Just like with business and family, there is rarely one solution that fits all. But I talked to some PMPA members who were generous enough to share some learned wisdom as they transitioned from one generation to the next.

Communication, Passion and a Plan

I spoke with John Detterbeck, fourth Detterbeck in the industry for Lester Detterbeck Enterprises (LDE) in Iron River, Michigan. His son, Kyle Detterbeck, transitioned to president of LDE. John shared several bits of wisdom from his experience and from witnessing other company’s transitions:

Make sure to have a clear plan and communication of that plan to the entire family. There are instances where some family members who are not involved with the business assume they are owed a piece of the business.
There can’t be two captains on the ship. There needs to be a clear leader and decision-maker.

The heir apparent needs to be passionate about the industry, start on the shop floor and take time to transition and learn every facet of the business.

Support is Essential

I spoke with Travis Donaldson, the second generation for Donmac Precision Machining in Foxboro, Ontario. His parents, Glenn and Joan Donaldson, founded the company in 1989. Travis shared his turmoil as he wrestled with asserting himself as a leader while respecting his parents and the business they built. He admits there were seriously stressful times and considered alternative careers instead of purchasing the business. His passion for precision machining and interest in the well-established business made it a worthy decision to work through the family dynamics. There were legal, financial and emotional challenges necessary for the transition.

Travis and his family found their way with support. As Travis states, “No one does it alone. Never in the history of anything great has a person achieved greatness without the support of others.” With the help of fellow PMPA members, trusted legal professionals, some family counselling and a lot of trust, the Donaldsons have found a balance for a thriving family and family business.

 

 

 

Author

Carli Kistler-Miller, MBA has over 25 years of experience with operations, event/meeting planning, marketing, writing and communications.
Email: gro.apmp@rellimc — Website: pmpa.org.

First Aid or Recordable

First aid is not a recordable. Recordables are injuries that
require treatment beyond first aid.’

by Miles Free III

Director of Industry Affairs, PMPA

Published November 1, 2024

Download Magazine Article

 

 

 

Does your company treat all first aid incidents as recordables? Do you require that every dispensed bandage or pain reliever be reported to management? Should you? As a former plant manager, I have had to deal with decisions like this. Given our commitment to continuous improvement, it is obvious that we should want to track first aid incidents so that we can address and eliminate their causes.  But that does not mean escalating them to, or treating them as, recordables.

The first thing to do is to recognize that first aid is different from a recordable. Recordable events involve any medical treatment required beyond first aid. Thus, it follows that “mere first aid” is not recordable. If you feel it necessary to have your employees report even first aid incidents to you, that is your discretion. But first aid is not recordable.

How does OSHA define first aid?
First aid refers to medical attention that is usually administered immediately after the injury occurs and at the location where it occurred. It often consists of a one-time, short-term treatment and requires little technology or training to administer. First aid can include cleaning minor cuts, scrapes, or scratches; treating a minor burn; applying bandages and dressings; the use of non-prescription medicine; draining blisters; removing debris from the eyes; massage; and drinking fluids to relieve heat stress. OSHA’s revised recordkeeping rule, which went into effect January 1, 2002, does not require first aid cases to be documented (bit.ly/PMPA-PM1124a).

OSHA has posted a First Aid List on its recordkeeping page (bit.ly/PMPA-PM1124b):

  • Using a non-prescription medication at non-prescription strength (for medications available in both prescription and non-prescription form, a recommendation by a physician or other licensed health care professional to use a non-prescription medication at prescription strength is considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes);
  • Administering tetanus immunizations (other immunizations, such as Hepatitis B vaccine or rabies vaccine, are considered medical treatment);
  • Cleaning, flushing or soaking wounds on the surface of the skin;
  • Using wound coverings such as bandages, band-aids, gauze pads and so on; or using butterfly bandages or Steri-Strips (other wound closing devices such as sutures, staples and so on are considered medical treatment);
  • Using hot or cold therapy;
  • Using any non-rigid means of support, such as elastic bandages, wraps, non-rigid back belts and so on (devices with rigid stays or other systems designed to immobilize parts of the body are considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes);
  • Using temporary immobilization devices while transporting an accident victim (e.g., splints, slings, neck collars, back boards and so on);
  • Drilling of a fingernail or toenail to relieve pressure, or draining fluid from a blister;
  • Using eye patches;
  • Removing foreign bodies from the eye using only irrigation or a cotton swab;
  • Removing splinters or foreign material from areas other than the eye by irrigation, tweezers, cotton swabs or other simple means;
  • Using finger guards;
  • Using massages (physical therapy or chiropractic treatment are considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes); or
  • Drinking fluids for relief of heat stress.

These are classified as first aid by OSHA, and so they are not recordable. If they do not need to be recorded, why do you need them to be reported? You have the authority and discretion to insist that any and all such incidents be reported to management. Or not.

How does OSHA define a recordable injury or illness?

  • Any work-related fatality;
  • Any work-related injury or illness that results in loss of consciousness, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job;
  • Any work-related injury or illness requiring medical treatment beyond first aid;
  • Any work-related diagnosed case of cancer, chronic irreversible diseases, fractured or cracked bones or teeth and punctured eardrums;
  • There are also special recording criteria for work-related cases involving: needlesticks and sharps injuries, medical removal, hearing loss and tuberculosis.

A good rule to use — and I used this when I was plant manager at a steel mill —  is if the application of the first aid required another person to provide it, management needs to be informed as soon as possible. The reasoning is that if it was so serious that it required assistance, management had a duty to know. And, to ensure that blood-borne safety protocols, washing and cleaning are taken to protect the person providing assistance as well as the person needing first aid. It also helps management help the team find and eliminate the root causes for the need for first aid in the
first place.

So as long as you and your team are able to distinguish between first aid versus more serious recordables, I think that we can all, in good conscience, relax the “report every bandage or pain reliever dispensed” requirement. Let’s focus on the significant few, not the trivial many.

 

 

 

Author

Miles Free III is the PMPA Director of Industry Affairs with over 50 years of experience in the areas of manufacturing, quality and steelmaking. Miles’ podcast is at pmpa.org/podcast. Email Miles